• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

• 페이스북 공유
• 트위터 공유

I admit I'm a Jakob Nielsen follower (though some of his views are excessive), and one of his big mantras seems to be to make sure you are consistent. Seems to me a lot of previous print folk are trying to meddle in Web stuff, and a lot of 'em are misguided. One example: the papers who are actually marketing "electronic editions" -- actual replicas of their print merchandise reproduced electronically on pc screens. I believe that customers of stories websites are on individual missions to get the information, and anything that freaks 'em out or confuses them (i.e., anything dramatically completely different than what they're used to seeing) will throw them for a loop. Specifically, 25 percent of Americans get news on-line at the very least three times a week, as compared to 23 p.c two years ago. People will not wish to get information from an internet site if it isn't designed in a logical approach, or if it simply plain appears too busy.

My changing issues round I also should have talked about consistency -- I need the altering round newspapers do with their entrance pages. Anyway, this begs for communication between design and development -- something I have been making an attempt to convince newspapers to do (through the considerably questionable methodology of begging them to rent me for that very goal). This may be an entire different animal, however it positively impacts design and development. But I feel the lull in customers might even have something to do with information sites' design. I'd add a third occasion to your "design vs. development" battle: conventional journalists. Sad. Regarding the two-sport star principle: what has your expertise been in making an attempt to persuade traditional print journalists that the web is important? Once once more, the 2-sport star is a necessary place. I agree: It's positively about the 2-sport star. It's all about the 2-sport star, right? It looks as if this is the eternal wrestle between design and improvement that is occurring on the net, proper? When i saw that the brand new York Times was doing the 'digital edition' crap, I felt like they were saying that the strictly Web version was inferior to the print product.

So, basically, I was a journalist who got fascinated with Web stuff. Also, do you consider your self extra of a journalist who obtained fascinated about Web stuff, or the other means round? I'm more of a fan of steadiness -- making sure that design and functionality work in concert on a web page as a substitute of one dominating the opposite. It's tough as hell to find a designer who is keen to work with that purpose in mind, although (or vice versa). Newspaper designers don't simply change the entrance page design everyday for the hell of it, they do it as a result of the content has changed and the design must replicate the newsworthiness of the brand new content. Somehow this love for information led me to newspaper reporting. Then it naturally led to the web. It's extra of a holistic viewpoint for Web stuff, although there's some extent the place all-encompassing concepts like that just turn into plain silliness. Chris, can you point out any examples of news websites that do that, if any? His spare, elegant, and remarkably correct illustrations still stand today as a few of the perfect examples of the medium. But what he can be finest remembered for have been his books and articles on sports instruction.

Jack’s two basic instruction books Jack Nicklaus’ Lesson Tee (New York, Simon & Schuster, 1972) and Golf My Way. New York, The Viking Press. New York, Simon & Schuster. He attended the Textile Highschool, taught himself anatomy by volunteering on the Bellvue Hospital morgue, and later studied at the Cooper Union and Art Students League. "Big League Secrets: Part 3. Del Crandell on the Art of Catching." Sports Illustrated 21 Apr 1958. (Del Crandell lifetime: .254, 179 HR, 657 RBI, 9 time All-star). "Big League Secrets: Part 1. Sal Maglie on the Art of Pitching." SI 17 Mar 1958. (Sal Maglie lifetime 119-62, 3.15 Era, 2 time All-star). "Mastery of Small Boat Sailing: Part 1." SI 23 Feb 1959. (Bill Cox Winner: Sears Cup, Mallory Cup, Prince of Wales Bowl. In 1957 Hogan approached Ravielli to illustrate a 5 part collection titled the "The Five Lessons: The trendy Fundamentals of Golf." The outcome, which was shortly turned into a e book, would grow to be, perhaps, an important e-book on golf instruction ever written.